12

On quinine

12.1

Value of quinine administration

During these years it must not be thought that nothing was being attempted to eradicate the disease. About 1902 I had arrived at the conclusion that once a man was infected with malaria, he should take quinine after his apparent recovery daily and not once a week, as was the custom. I made this observation first of all from one of my dressers (Lewis) in Klang Hospital, who, although he took quinine once a week with a tonic in the interval after the pyrexia had disappeared, had a return of the pyrexia about every ten days for many weeks, and only got rid of it finally by constantly taking quinine for some months.

In 1904, having determined that there was much malaria on certain estates, I advised the administration of quinine at first in weekly doses of 10 grains, and later of bi-weekly doses.18

Table 12.1: Numbers of children examined and found infected with malaria in the months of November and December on certain estates. On each estate, quinine was given systematically in 1905 but not in 1904.
Estate No. 1904: quinine not given 1905: quinine given
Examined Infected Infected (%) Examined Infected Infected (%)
1 16 10 62.5 17 2 11.7
2 41 16 37.8 40 5 12.5
3 12 12 100.0 17 2 11.0
4       17 4 23.5

Tables 12.112.3 show the result of giving quinine in the above-mentioned doses. An estate bears the same number in all the tables. The administration of quinine is doubtful in estate No. 4. From it the manager was dismissed.

Table 12.2: Number of children infected with malaria in November and December on estates on which quinine was not given systematically in either 1904 or 1905
Estate 1904 1905
No. examined No. infected % infected No. examined No. infected % infected
5 66 33 50.0 52 23 44.2
6 25 7 28.0 13 6 46.0
7       15 4 26.1
8       16 11 68.7
Table 12.3: Number of coolies not at work on account of malaria on the day of my monthly visit, November 1905
Estate Quinine given Estate Quinine not given
Coolies (n) Malaria (n) Malaria (%)   Coolies (n) Malaria (n) Malaria (%)
1 70 0 0.0 5 800 33 4.1
2 320 2 0.6 6 170 12 7.0
3 120 1 0.8 7 250 13 5.2
4 80 5 6.2 212 27 12.6
  590 8 1.3   1432 85 5.8
12.2

Our hopes

These figures appeared to me to be most encouraging, and I said of quinine administration, in a Presidential Address before the Native States Division of the British Medical Association in Ipoh in 1906:

Although many, without thinking, consider it acts merely by curing the individual after he has been infected, and aborting threatened attacks, it is in reality much more than this. It is a real prophylaxis, for by cutting short attacks, it diminishes the chances of mosquitoes becoming infected, and thus prevents other coolies from ever becoming infected. It is by no means a case of locking the stable door after the horse has been stolen, and there need be no hesitation in advocating its use.

Nevertheless, it is not a method which commands my unqualified approval, for the simple reason that it requires too much of the manager. He has other work to do, work which must be shown as done in his monthly report, or his directors will want to know why? Instead of spending perhaps the best and coolest time of the morning giving out quinine, he wishes to go out into the field. Again, the manager himself may fall ill, and there may be no one to see the coolies take their quinine. A new manager may come, and he has probably to learn by bitter experience, that the hours spent in giving out quinine are not only well spent, but must be so spent, if the labour force is to be kept together. Again, it is not given to every manager to have the patience to see every coolie, and especially every child, gets its quinine ration, and with new coolies more or less undisciplined, there may be great difficulty in getting down the quinine, as the coolie has little faith in it. It is a great point when a ‘Kangany’ realises the value of quinine, but at the same time, no native can be trusted entirely with this, and it is a considerable call on the manager’s time. Then when the necessity appears to pass off, there will always be a tendency to slackness, as with all human efforts. Therefore, while I value the method, I consider the call it makes on the manager, a very serious drawback.

I hoped by giving quinine daily to those who had malaria, to prevent the formation of gametocytes which would infect mosquitoes; and that if any new coolies should chance to become infected, quinine twice a week would destroy the parasites before they had time to develop to numbers sufficient to give fever to the host. As will be seen later, neither of these hopes have been fulfilled, since it has been impossible to give the large doses which would be necessary to attain this object in people who are working. And secondly, as I shall show later, what may be a sufficient dose when malaria is not intense, is quite insufficient when it is. My advice in 1906 was as follows:

  1. (1)That every coolie should get a cup of hot coffee before starting work in the morning.
  2. (2)That twice a week every coolie should get ten grains of quinine, and every child five grains.
  3. (3)That every coolie who has fever should have a mark put against his name on the check roll when he resumes work, should receive no ‘Name’ for his day’s work until he has taken a dose of quinine, in the manager’s presence.
12.3

A total failure

This advice was followed on one estate which was just being opened up, and the result was a total failure of the quinine even to hold the disease in check; so that on 6th November every coolie was put on 10 grains of quinine daily, and those who were not at work on 20 grains; it being assumed that, if he did not work he might be unwell; and that the extra dose of quinine would do him good by preventing an attack of fever, even if he had no pyrexia at the time. The effect of the daily dose was to reduce sickness to a marked extent, as Table 12.4 shows.

Table 12.4: Number of coolies who were unable to work from “fever” and “other diseases” during certain months in 1906 and 1907
  1906 1907
Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. April May June
Fever 136 152 50 38 19 14 14 5 8
Other diseases 147 195 83 81 41 54 54 14 10
Total 283 347 133 119 60 68 68 19 18
No. of coolies on the estate 220a 245a 243 247 248 234 255 322 228
a
In Nov. and Dec., the disease totals exceed the number of coolies on the estate. Watson does not explain whether coolies that had “fever” and “other” diseases concurrently were listed twice, or multiple periods of absence within one month were counted separately (M.P.)

It is interesting to observe that what we saw when malaria was reduced in Klang Town, namely the reduction in diseases other than those recognised by the general population of malaria, was reduced on this estate likewise with the reduction of the amount of malaria.

The economic effect of the malaria and the effect of the quinine can also be observed from Table 12.5. The decrease in the out-turn of the labour of 1907 was due to unsatisfactory work of the dresser in charge, who had to be dismissed. It was found he was seriously neglecting his duties, as the coolies who did not turn out to work were not sought for and given the extra quinine. The unreliableness of native dressers will always be one of the great drawbacks to quinine administration. In this instance, the dresser, who by his hard work had helped so materially to obtain such good results in 1906 and the early part of 1907, now became lazy and mischievous for no apparent reason, and ultimately was convicted and sent to prison for six months for attempting to cause riot by setting one class of coolie against another.

Table 12.5: Fitness for work among coolies on one estate. Number of coolies on this estate, the number of days which it would have been possible for these coolies to work had they worked every working day of the month, the number of days they actually worked, and the percentage this forms of the possible working days.
Month Coolies Working days
possible actual actual (%)
1906
  May 69 1241 1050 84.6
  June 135 2499 2100 84.0
  July 190 4914 3679 74.6
  August 299 8073 5590 69.2
  September 248 6200 4257 68.7
  October 220 5380 3352 62.3
  November 245 6366 4238 66.5
  December 243 6318 4584 72.5
1907
  January 247 6175 4907 79.0
  February 248 5952 4829 81.1
  March 248     79.8
  April       76.9
  Junea       83.0
  July       84.0
  August       90.0
  September       90.0
  October       79.0
  November       76.0
  December       77.0
a
Data for May 1907 are missing in the original, as are absolute numbers from March onwards (M.P.)

The best results I have obtained, on Seafield Estate, are shown in Table 12.6. Writing in 1906 I described the condition of this estate in 1905 as follows:

In November, out of 212 coolies I found 27 down with fever on one day (where) 5 children had died in one week: (where) coolies were bolting daily, and the work of the estate was almost paralysed. This was followed by an outbreak of dysentery, and it was in the month of February before malaria was got in hand.

Table 12.6: Examination results and death rates on Seafield Estate between 1905 and 1909
    1905 1906 1907 1908 1909
Average population   175 380 399
Blood examination Sample number 16 9
  Infected (%) 68.7 76
Spleen examination Sample number 16 17 23   47
  Enlarged (%) 56 88 39   62
Death rate (‰) Div. I   114 66 34
  Div. II     60 27

In 1906 or the beginning of 1907 it was discovered that the pills which were supposed to contain 4 grains of quinine contained much less than that amount, namely about one grain. The dose was then increased with a steady improvement in the death rate each year. It is interesting that the fall held good for each division of the estate. In 1905 in the month of October 245 coolies worked 3393 days, or 58%, of the possible working days. In October 1906, 260 coolies worked 2131 days, 70.9%, of the possible.

The economic effect of this quinine administration has been that the present small labour force now maintains in perfect order some 2000 acres at a minimum cost. That it is not due to any improvement in the health of the estate from other causes, will be seen from the following paragraphs relating to the limitations of quinine.

12.4

The limitations of quinine

In 1908 and 1909 considerable attention was being paid to the presence of the Ankylostoma worm in coolies, and at the request of the Institute for Medical Research, I arranged in April 1909 for the examination of a large number of coolies. I chose for this purpose a healthy estate where no quinine was given, and the above-mentioned estate, on which quinine was being administered with such satisfactory results.

The result was to show that while Ankylostoma was present in large numbers on both estates, on the healthy one (Estate “V”) 2 out of 160, or 1-3%, of the coolies had parasites in their peripheral blood, and on the other estate no fewer than 56 out of 215 or 26%, showed the parasite. The examinations were made by Dr. A. T. Stanton of the Institute to whom I am indebted for the figures.

These results, in view of the splendid physique and work done by the force, appeared to warrant further inquiry. I accordingly visited the estate and examined all the coolies on it, paying particular attention to those who had been shown to have had parasites in their blood. I separated the 56 as shown in Table 12.7.

Table 12.7: Health conditions among 56 coolies from one estate who were identified as carriers of Ancylostoma
Condition Number
Well developed, well nourished, and apparently in perfect health 42
Less well developed and nourished, but still apparently in good health and fit for work 5
Anaemic 1
In hospital 2
Died 1
Deserted 1
Paid off 4
Total 56

In other words, 75%, of the coolies with parasites in their peripheral blood were apparently in the most perfect health, while 87.5%, were in good health and fit for work. Of the 48 seen 30 or 62%, had enlarged spleens, and of the whole labour force of 345 I found 174 or 50.4% with enlargement.

On one division the coolies were getting 6 and on the other 8 grains, with double doses when they were ill or off work, often quinine in solution. As at this time mosquitoes were breeding freely on the estate in the ravines, close to which the coolies were living, and adult A. maculatus could be obtained in the lines at any time, this observation is of the greatest value in determining the effect of quinine. It clearly demonstrates that, while keeping the malaria in check, so that the coolies could carry on their work, three years’ administration of the drug had entirely failed to eradicate the disease. That the estate is really as unhealthy as ever is shown by the visitors to it, who contract malaria in about ten days, and even the head kangany suffered severely from malaria on his return to the estate after a visit to India.

Finally, out of nineteen A. maculatus captured in the lines, four or 21% had malaria; two with zygotes, one with sporozoites, and one with both zygotes and sporozoites.

Desiring to have further information on this important point, I took the blood of every man, woman, and child on an estate on which quinine was being given in the most thorough and systematic manner. The doses being given were 10 grains daily to each adult who worked, and 20 to those who did not work, the latter being given in solution. To the children 5 grains were given daily, and double doses also to those who did not work. Mr. R. W. B. Lazaroo kindly examined the slides for me, and reported the data shown in Table 12.8.

Table 12.8: Incidence of malaria parasites in blood samples from residents of an estate on which quinine was administered systematically
Results from children (n=29) Number Rate (%)
  malignant parasites (subtertian) 5 17.27
  benign tertian 2 6.89
  quartan 1 3.44
  no parasites seen 21  
  Cumulative 29 27.58
Results from adults (n=125) Number Rate (%)
  malignant parasites (subtertian) 15 12.0
  benign tertian 3 3.4
  quartan 5 4.0
  no parasites seen 102  
  Cumulative 125 18.4
Total 154 20.12

These figures agree very closely with the ones obtained by Dr. Stanton, and they at once supply the reason why no improvement has taken place in the hill land estates despite the use of quinine in what appear very large doses for constant administration. Now this failure to eradicate malaria falls into line with our knowledge generally of quinine. I would indicate the following as the limitations of quinine:

  1. (1)However thorough the dosing has been, malaria is very liable to return to a patient although the possibility of reinfection is excluded. In other words quinine does not poison the parasite outright.
  2. (2)When a person is attacked by malignant malaria (subtertian) for the first time, even with the most thorough administration of quinine in solution, some four or five days elapse before the temperature falls, and Rogers has published figures which show that 60 grains daily have no advantage over 20 grains or less.19
  3. (3)In bad epidemics I have watched cases of malaria admitted to hospital, who have had no pyrexia, but rather who have been in the algid state; who despite the administration of quinine by the mouth, by the rectum, and intramuscularly to the extent of 40 grains daily, have continued for four days in this algid condition and then died. During this time the skin was in a condition of a cold clammy sweat. No diminution appeared in the number of parasites in the blood. The patient apparently failed to react any way.
  4. (4)It is common experience that a patient, particularly if he is suffering from benign tertian malaria, must be put to bed before pyrexia will leave him, even when on full doses of quinine.

Finally, when we remember that thousands and thousands of people, who do not take nor have the opportunity of taking quinine, recover from the disease yearly, it is evident that the human subject of the disease must depend on some power within himself to save him from death. Daniels, in his Presidential Address to the British Medical Association in 1909 in Belfast [22], appears to me to strike the right note when he insists that the protozoal diseases, of which malaria is a member, may persist for years without sexual regeneration, and despite any drugs which may be given; and that freedom from the disease can be acquired only by the development of resistant powers within the human host. It is when we consider malaria as an infection of the human host by a parasite, which in the majority of infections lasts for at least three or four months, and in exceptional cases for years; in which the relationship of the parasite to its host is that of enemies at constant war; where for a time first one and then the other may be in the ascendant; and where victory in the end may be to either, that we can understand the apparently contradictory results of quinine.

When from any cause the health of the host is depressed, the parasite increases in numbers and may be found in the peripheral blood. As the struggle continues and the life of the parasite is threatened, in harmony with the rule of nature generally, the parasite produces the sexual forms destined to continue its existence as a species. Thus, from time to time, the human host becomes dangerous to others, if anophelines which form a congenial breeding place for the sexual forms (i.e., capable of carrying malaria) are present.

When, on the other hand, the health of the host is improved from any cause, the parasites are reduced in numbers and may disappear from the peripheral blood. The parasites may, in the end, die or be killed out by the host. It is not unlikely that two separate immunities are required by the host before the parasite is destroyed. It appears to me to be not uncommon for the host to become immune to the poison causing pyrexia long before it acquires powers to reduce the number of parasites; for cases with numerous parasites and without pyrexia over considerable periods are not uncommon, indeed are recorded by every writer on malaria.20

The true action of quinine appears to be to assist the human host in working out for himself the resistant power which will ultimately free him from the disease. It acts either by attenuating the virus within the host, or by increasing the resisting power of the host in some unknown way, or possibly by both. Without quinine in many cases, especially in very unhealthy spots, the human host would die before he had acquired his resistant powers. We thus see that, if quinine in sufficient doses be given, the man will gradually overcome the parasites, and apparently suffer little from them; but at the same time we see that during this period he is capable of infecting others. The man is for a time a “malaria carrier” not unlike the typhoid carrier.

There must be an optimum dose of quinine, possibly it varies with the individual, and, from time to time, in the same individual; but whatever that dose be, it must bear a close resemblance to the ordinary therapeutic dose.

Finally if, as has been shown, the immunity from malaria produced by quinine leaves the patient infective while he is acquiring the immunity, then it will be impossible in the presence of many anophelines, and in the presence of many new arrivals (such as newly born children) ever to eradicate malaria by quinine. It follows, too, that if drainage be an alternative, even although more expensive, drainage must be the method which should be adopted. Even if a community possessed no money for drainage, money might be borrowed with which to carry out the works, and at the end there would be an asset to show for the expenditure. Borrowing, however, would be impossible if the object were to buy quinine, since in the end nothing could be shown for the money, except a people still liable to malaria, and possibly some agriculture which could not be maintained without the constant use of the drug.

12.5

Observations on quinine administration: time and form

When I first began quinine administration systematically to large bodies of coolies, I advised quinine sulphate in solution and in the morning. I advised the solution because in solution its action is more certain, and it would thus be possible to use a smaller quantity of the drug; I advised the morning because the parasites usually sporulate in the forenoon, and consequently would then meet with the quinine in full strength.

In practice it was found that there were serious objections both to the time and the form of administration. In solution the action was so certain, that in 10-grain doses cinchonism was so marked that the coolies could not work in the sun. In addition, they were frequently sick after the dose; ultimately it was suspected that they deliberately vomited the dose to avoid the unpleasant after-effects. Since then, it has been given when work is finished for the day, that is, about 2.30 P.M.

When I decided to abandon the solution, I considered that the compressed forms as usually supplied were too much compressed, and coolies were taught to make quinine pills with bread. They became astonishingly expert at this. The pills were supposed to contain 4 grains of quinine, but after a time it was found they were putting in too large a proportion of bread as the pills were thereby more easily made.

In order to standardise the dose, in 1907 I obtained machines from England, and hoped to make tablets, compressing the drug just enough to keep it in a mass. The machines were not a success, as the rate at which the tablets could be turned out was far below that of the coolie making pills by hand, and quite insufficient to meet the demand. I therefore returned to the pills, but now (1909) have them made by mixing dry quinine sulphate with so much gum solution, that when made the pills can be crushed easily between the finger and thumb. There are at the present moment just over 4000 coolies taking 10 grains daily, with double doses when off work.21

The efficiency with which the drug is administered depends on the manager of the estate. Each year the drug is being given over larger areas and with greater efficiency, as its value is being better recognised. A change of manager is usually followed by less care being taken to give the drug, and this is a serious drawback.

Europeans tell me that it is impossible to continue the use of quinine solution for any length of time. If taken in the morning, they cannot take food and cannot work in the sun. If taken at night, even dry quinine prevents sleep. I hoped at one time that, if taken at night, larger doses could be taken, the effects of which would pass off during sleep. But men are unanimous that taken at this time it prevents proper sleep, and the drug is now rarely taken at night.

Quinine sulphate in powder often fails to have any effect on an attack of malaria if there is gastric disturbance; this even when 20 or 30 grains are given in the course of twenty-four hours, and for a period of a week. In such cases I give quinine hydrochloride with a little morphia in solution. This effectively controls the sickness, and the temperature is usually down in thirty-six hours. I have often wished to try the old native remedy of opium with the quinine, but have never felt quite justified in doing so, on a large enough scale to be of value.

Warburg’s tincture I have used both for pyrexial attacks and as a preventive. It appears to have no special advantage over a simple mixture of hydrochloride and morphia. I have also given it over considerable periods, combined with additional quinine, to bring the dose of the latter up to 15 or 10 grains as the case might be. I cannot see that it has any special advantage.

Small children learn to swallow pills very quickly. For infants I find the easiest way to administer quinine, is to give euchinine (quinine ethyl carbonate) broken up in a little sweetened condensed milk.

On estates, where quinine has been much used, it is not uncommon to find coolies ask for solution in preference to pills, when they have fever or suspect an attack is coming on. Kanganies are often found to carry pills in their pockets, and give them out to any coolie who complains or asks for them during the day. On the other hand, I recently found the conductor on an estate, where quinine has been given daily to the coolies for four years with the best results, who had suffered from malaria himself and taken quinine for it, would not give his wife quinine when she was almost dead with malaria, until literally forced to do so. If such happens with a native who reads and writes English, who lives on an estate, where if on any place in the world quinine has shown its power to control malaria, it is impossible to believe that native populations will ever be induced voluntarily to take quinine in such doses as will effect any marked difference on the death rate of the disease.

Although quinine sulphate may not be absorbed when there is gastric disturbance, there can be no question about its being absorbed in the majority of cases. For a week after a coolie or a European begins the daily consumption of quinine powder or pills, quite definite symptoms are felt in the head. After that period no unpleasantness is experienced, unless the dose be increased. Instinctively men have learned to take their total quantity broken up into two or three doses. And my object now on the most intensely malarious places is to have from 10 to 15 grains taken daily without producing symptoms. After an attack of malaria I advise 20 grains in solution daily for a week, and then reduce the dose to 10 grains in pill form, resuming 20 grains should the person feel unwell, and find his temperature 100°F or more taken in the mouth.

I prefer the sulphate for continuous use because the more soluble forms are more apt to produce cinchonism. There is reason to believe the sulphate is absorbed not only from the stomach, but from the intestines. Its slower rate of absorption, therefore, leads to less violent fluctuation in the amount circulating in the blood, than where more soluble preparations are used. It has the advantage, too, that a dose will, therefore, have a more continuous action, and be present in the tissues and fluid for a longer period, than where the preparation is more rapidly absorbed and presumably more rapidly eliminated or destroyed.

Nor is it an unimportant advantage where thousands of coolies are receiving comparatively large doses daily, that the price of the sulphate is some 30 to 50% less than the other common preparations.

1920

Towards the end of 1912 I contracted malaria for the first time. It was a severe attack of benign tertian malaria with continuous fever for four days. After the febrile attack was over, the attempt to resume ordinary diet was followed by acute gastritis, and I had an unusually favourable opportunity of observing the effects of several salts of quinine.

Very soon, I came to prefer a simple watery solution of quinine dihydrochloride flavoured with orange or ginger. Twenty grains divided into three doses were taken daily with meals. It was my custom to swallow a few mouthfuls of some liquid, such as tea, coffee, or soup; then to take the quinine; and afterwards proceed with the meal. The taste of the quinine lasted only a minute or two. After the first week I was not conscious of any ringing of the ears or other symptoms of cinchonism.

When the quinine was taken half an hour before the meal, cinchonism was pronounced and unpleasant; when taken after the meal, it frequently produced “acidity.” Curiously enough tabloids and capsules taken with or after a meal produced the same “acidity” and discomfort.

For six months I took 20 grains daily in solution, and rapidly recovered health. No relapse occurred while I was taking it, or after I stopped it. In 1914, I contracted what there is good reason to believe was a new infection of benign tertian malaria. For it, I took quinine in the same doses for five months, with the same happy result as in 1912. Since stopping the drug I have had no relapse.

12.6

Relation of dose to intensity of malaria

1909

I think the same dose of quinine may be of more apparent value where the amount of malaria is small, than where it is great. I have long been of the opinion, too, that what is supposed to be a relapse, is often in reality a new infection. It is impossible to decide with absolute certainty; but there is a certain amount of evidence, beyond the few cases where we find different parasites in different attacks.

For example, when in the service of Government, it was one of my duties to visit a place called Jugra at regular intervals. Jugra is intensely malarious. Government servants and their wives and families suffer severely from the disease. The place is consequently very unpopular, and at each visit I was interviewed by one or more applicants for transfer on medical grounds. As long as Government decided to keep Jugra as a district centre, so long must its servants remain; and I refused to grant certificates on the ground of ill-health, if the complaint was merely of attacks of malaria. I advised daily quinine, and it was given to the police daily by a dresser from the hospital.

Before I gave a certificate I had to be satisfied that some danger of serious damage to health existed. I thus had an opportunity of watching people progressively deteriorate, and when I considered there was any real danger, I recommended transfer. This was, in the case of the police and clerks, often to Klang; and I was then still able to keep them under observation. It was interesting to observe the steady improvement, with but few relapses in most cases, after transfer to a non-malarious place. Had their almost constant attacks of fever when in Jugra been merely relapses, these would certainly not have ceased so suddenly when the patient came to Klang, nor would the improvement in health have begun so soon, and been so marked; and this, when I am sure they were taking less quinine than when in Jugra, and perhaps none at all.

What appears to bear out the same idea is the severity of the attacks of malaria in Europeans on intensely malarious estates. These patients are constantly going down with malaria, even when on daily doses of 10 grains of the sulphate. A short holiday usually enables them to recover; but attacks recur soon after their return to work, often in the usual period necessary for new infections to manifest themselves. Should they permanently leave the unhealthy place, they rapidly recover, even when their new work and the climatic conditions under which they labour are identical with that of the unhealthy place they have left.

An observation on Estate “RR” has some bearing on this point. This estate is in three divisions, and there is a European bungalow on each. Bungalow I. is situated between the lines marked 100 and those marked 37 (see Figure 8.1). It is on a ravine in which I have not been able to find A. maculatus, and which I think is probably unsuitable for them. Bungalow II. and Bungalow III. are near to ravines in which A. maculatus swarm, and the spleen rate of the lines, if we exclude new arrivals, is practically 100%. The history of the bungalows is that while I. is malarious, II. and III. are intensely so.

In Bungalow I. six Europeans, who from time to time have lived there, have had attacks, with the exception of one who took 10 grains of quinine daily for the two years he was there. One of the five attacked had only two attacks, and these at intervals of a year. The others suffered more severely, but soon became free on taking the drug daily; while neglect just as certainly led to new attacks. Ten servants had malaria in 1907, and there was difficulty in keeping servants, until they were compelled to take the drug under supervision. It will thus be seen that the bungalow was malarious, but not intensely so.

Bungalow II. has been more malarious, and the three Europeans who have lived in it have been severely attacked time and again, and have frequently been compelled to go on periods of sick leave.

Now in 1909 it was necessary to rearrange the work of the estate. A and B who had lived in Bungalow I.—A never having had an attack, and B having suffered from only two attacks—were transferred to Bungalows III. and II. respectively, while C was transferred from II. to I. A and B now suffered very severely from malaria, and both were invalided for a time, and this although they were taking the same amount of quinine as when in Bungalow I. C, on the other hand, ceased to have attacks, and gradually reduced his daily dose, until, when taking only about 5 grains a week, he had a sharp attack, which put him on to his full doses again. That there is no improvement in the health of Bungalow I. is seen from D, who about the same time arrived on the estate, refused to take quinine, and had so severe an attack that he had to be sent on leave for a month.

Now the work on all the divisions is practically the same. It is impossible to believe that A and B were never infected in Bungalow I. during the two years they lived there, and when the servants and other Europeans suffered frequently from the disease. The only explanation appears to me to be that the dose of quinine which kept them free from symptoms in Bungalow I. was insufficient to do so when they had to overcome larger and more frequent infections.

Again we saw (Figure 11.1) that the quinine which appeared to keep the old coolies in health in 1906, failed to keep the new arrivals in health, but that “from the new it (malaria) spread to the old” and the dose of all had to be increased. From this I concluded that the large number of new coolies had raised the percentage of infected mosquitoes on the estates, and that by old coolies infecting new, and these again infecting the old, a vicious circle was established which could only be broken by the gradual establishment of immunity among both old and new.

The following is another instance of a large dose (the largest I have known taken continuously) giving protection where smaller doses have failed. The individual (a close relative of my own) took 20 grains of quinine sulphate daily for three months. He had previously suffered so severely from malaria on an unhealthy estate, although he had been taking quinine in 10-grain doses, that he had to give up his post as manager. He had twice to go to a hill station to recover his health; ultimately he resigned his post. I was anxiously considering the necessity of invaliding him home. He was so breathless he could walk only a few yards; his weight had fallen to 136 pounds. He was, however, determined not to go to England, and took a post on another, but smaller, intensely malarious estate; one where each of his predecessors had left a wreck.

Its spleen rate has been 100% for some years. He took 20 grains of quinine sulphate in gelatine capsules daily, taking 5 grains at a dose. In two months his weight had gone up from 136 to 164 pounds. He said he had an excellent appetite, and was soon playing in an interstate rugby match. After three months he reduced the dose to 15 grains daily, and he has been on this dose for four months.

I have kept a watch on him, and have critically examined him, not without some anxiety, lest the drug should do harm. But I cannot recommend a reduction to less than 15 grains as long as he is well, and when to take less might spell disaster. The fine bungalow in which he lives is at the top of a ravine, and has been so unhealthy in the past that its abandonment was suggested by the owners. A. maculatus breeds freely in the ravine.

The marked contrast between this planter whose health improved, when taking large doses, and the progressive deterioration in his predecessors, who were on smaller doses, is so striking as to be a matter of general comment. And I think we are driven to the conclusion that in this extremely malarious place, larger doses are required than are usually taken in malarious places.

Each year has only strengthened my view that, to keep a European or a labour force in apparent health, the amount of quinine to be given bears a relation to the amount of malaria in the place at the time. The more the malaria the more frequently, and in larger doses, must the drug be given.

This would explain, too, the contradictory results obtained by various observers when quinine has been given as a prophylactic. Not only does it explain and bring these contradictory observations into line, but the observations recorded here help us to understand the cause of the variation of the intensity of malaria in different places, and in the same place from time to time.

From clinical observation, I think we are justified in concluding that the very frequent attacks, from which men suffer when in very malarious places as compared with the few attacks when removed to non-malarious places, are due to fresh infections, and not to relapses. If such an explanation of the more frequent attacks be accepted, then the necessity for the administration of quinine in larger quantities, approaching ordinary therapeutic doses, in the more malarious places, and at times of the greater prevalence of the disease, is easily understood. The human host has larger quantities of malarial parasites injected into him, and thus requires an increased protection by quinine.

Again, on the flat land, we saw that the nearer we were to the breeding place of the anopheline—that is, the jungle—the greater the malaria: indeed, within the half-mile radius, it bears a definite ratio. We are forced, therefore, to believe that the intensity of malaria bears a definite relation to the number of anophelines in the air, to the number of times a person is bitten, and to the number of infections he receives.

Similarly, on the hilly land, observations from all time have shown that the head of a ravine is the most malarious; it is nearest to the chief breeding places of the anophelines. The most malarious bungalows in the country are those situated at the head of, or close to, a ravine. The once notorious bungalow on Drummond’s Hill, Taiping, had its servants’ quarters over a ravine. Now it is obvious that the inhabitants of such a place must be bitten oftener, and infected oftener, than those living at a distance from the breeding place. They are infected time and again by their own parasites after passing through a mosquito in which, too, by the sexual reproduction that occurs in the mosquito, it is not improbable the parasites have acquired an exalted virulence.

Thus again we are forced to believe that the greater intensity and persistence of malaria in the hilly land is due to the greater number of anophelines, and the greater number of infections which the persons in these regions receive.

Now if the foregoing be true, it would follow that malaria would also be intensified by increasing the percentage of the infected mosquitoes, without increasing the total number which bite. And we find it to be so in fact, as seen from the infection of old from new coolies. The introduction of many new non-immune coolies, who almost simultaneously contracted malaria from the few still infectious old coolies, soon raised the percentage of persons with parasites in their peripheral blood, and capable of infecting mosquitoes to a higher degree than when there were only old coolies, most of whom had acquired a considerable amount of immunity and control over their parasites. A higher percentage of mosquitoes soon becomes infected, and these, in biting old and new coolies indiscriminately, soon increases the infection of the former and leads to their again suffering from attacks of the disease.

The intensity of malaria therefore depends, in my opinion, on the absolute number of infected mosquitoes in a locality, and anything which increases the number of malaria-carrying anophelines therefore increases the intensity of malaria.22

Many of the factors, which influenced the prevalence and intensity of malaria, were well known to our fathers before us. Such were disturbance of soil, interference with drainage, seasonal variations in temperature and rainfall, etc., etc., and it is extremely interesting to see that although their deductions as to the cause of malaria were incorrect, their observations were marvellously correct. In childhood’s language they were “very, very hot” in their search for one of nature’s most cunningly hidden secrets; and I desire to pay my humble tribute of respect to their memories.

Finally, if these observations be correct and the deductions be sound, the anopheline is the factor in the production of malaria which must be eliminated, if any permanent improvement is to take place.

12.7

Ill-effects of quinine

It has been with a due sense of responsibility, and no little anxiety, that I have found myself the instrument in causing large numbers of people to take quinine for prolonged periods in doses which appear excessive to many, and doses which year to year tend to increase in amount. I have watched the effect of its administration with care, and if it is producing any ill-effects, they are of such a nature as not easily to be detected—at any rate I have not detected them—and they are of infinitely less consequence than malaria.

I have rarely given more than 20 grains daily unless on microscopic examination the patient’s blood was so full of parasites as to show there was immediate danger to life. In such cases I have given up to 40 grains mostly per rectum, retaining the mouth for the administration of nourishment.

I have never seen a case of quinine blindness,23 nor have I had in my practice any patient who complained of deafness or ear symptoms for more than a few days. Occasionally a patient, the subject of malaria who does not take quinine in sufficient doses, complains of “indigestion.” If on sulphate, I may order hydrochloride in increased doses, which usually puts him right. Time and again, when a man has complained that he has “not been up to the mark” and thought he has been taking too much of the drug, I have advised increasing instead of reducing the dose with the most satisfactory results; so, too, when a man who has had malaria says he is feeling “particularly well.”

Miscarriage is often attributed to a dose of quinine. Yet I could quote instances of patients who have taken quinine throughout pregnancy and been delivered at full time. On the other hand an attack of malaria is notorious as producing abortion; and if the attack comes on within the last two months of pregnancy, labour will almost certainly follow. It is true quinine is often given in these cases; but the futility of quinine in ordinary doses when given to induce, or accelerate labour, in a healthy woman excludes the theory that quinine is the active agent in producing the abortion of the malarious patient.

Occasionally, but very rarely, a cutaneous eruption appears, when doses of quinine are first given, but the rash disappears with the continued use of the drug. One man when first put on 15 grains daily developed a severe nettle-rash which was intensely irritating. It disappeared within a week.

1920

Since the above was written I met a lady in Scotland who has a real idiosyncrasy for quinine. Her husband, a medical man, informs me that she develops a severe dermatitis, with grave constitutional symptoms, even from 2 grains of the drug; and there is little doubt that a large dose would kill her.

12.8

Cost of quinine administration

It must not be forgotten, too, that the administration of quinine in effective doses in a malarious locality is by no means an inexpensive method of combating malaria. To give 10 grains daily to 1000 people without any extra to those who actually have pyrexia for ten years, would cost about £1900 sterling.24 Such a sum, if lent by a Government to a community at a reasonable rate of interest, would free a very large area from malaria, if drainage methods suitable to the local anophelines were employed. And in ten years the community would have some years of prosperity and health in which to repay the loan. In the case of many small villages it would probably be possible to eradicate the breeding places of anophelines, where they were in the midst of the community, at a mere fraction of the money which would be required to dose the population effectively with quinine even for a year. While for larger communities the cost of drainage would be relatively much cheaper than in the case of the smaller ones, since the same expenditure would protect a relatively larger number of people.

12.9

Relative values of quinine administration and drainage

We have seen that quinine at its best, and when administered with a thoroughness, the result of a discipline impossible of attainment in an ordinary population, still leaves a large percentage of the population capable of infecting others. It can, therefore, never eradicate malaria in the presence of newcomers, and where there are many anophelines. We have seen, too, that to attain this best result in a malarious place costs a fairly considerable sum. Quinine, therefore, in my opinion, cannot for a moment be ranked with drainage.

It cannot be too strongly urged that efficient land drainage not only is a radical anti-malaria measure, but is of first-class importance in almost all forms of agriculture; and that malaria is essentially a rural disease. In dry forms of culture, it often makes the difference between good land and bad land, between good crops and poor crops. And in wet culture it is no less important. Cromer insists that in Egypt, the success of irrigation depends no less on the channels for taking off the water than on the irrigation channels for its supply. It is notorious, too, that badly drained irrigated land is not only of less value agriculturally, but is also more malarious than irrigated land, where by means of an efferent system, the water on the land is more fully under control.

Finally I would urge that when the time comes for unanimity as to what should be done, the malaria problem will still be, as it is, essentially a financial one. In the end the affected community must find the means of combating the disease. To me it appears that any means, which will enrich the population, will enable it to make greater effort to overcome the disease. If, by drainage, we can enrich not only the people and the land, but by the same measure help to reduce the disease, drainage must be the measure of first importance.

Whether quinine be supplied free by a Government or sold at cost price or at a loss to the Government, a price is being paid; and the people are in reality being assessed an amount, however small, which would still have paid the interest on a loan for a radical drainage work. Perhaps the work would only be a small one, but no matter; for it would definitely and for all time, if upkept, place the inhabitants beyond the reach of the disease.

It is here that I think a Government can help to break the vicious circle which makes the malarious poor and the poor malarious, and can assist a people to initiate drainage works, which from poverty they themselves cannot begin; even if Government cannot pay for drainage works out of revenue, then by pledging its credit, a Government can obtain money on loan. Both capital and interest can be paid by assessment of the land benefited.25

Of course care must be taken that the works will improve the area; to me it appears that in this direction lies the chief hope of eradicating malaria. Malaria over large areas cannot be eradicated in a day. But from what I have seen of the results of radical measures I feel strongly that by radical measures will the end be attained soonest; that every success will help others; that people will be saved who will never consent to take quinine in sufficient doses, if at all; and that only by radical measures will be stopped the infection from, and the death of, the vast mass of those who suffer from “malaria sine pyrexia,” those who fail to recognise they suffer from malaria,26 who as we saw from the Klang figures account for a very large percentage of the death rate of a malarious community.

12.10

The experience of the war

1920 —The experience of the war bears out these conclusions. In Salonica, where infection and re-infection by mosquitoes constantly occurred, quinine failed entirely to protect the troops, just as it had failed in the Malay States.

In France, where re-infection did not take place, two divisions of malaria-stricken troops from Salonica were put in the firing line after two months’ thorough administration of quinine, carried out under Lieutenant-Colonel J. Dalrymple, C.M.G. Fifteen grains in solution were given for fourteen days; and for eight weeks 10 grains in solution. The strictest discipline was maintained in the administration.

12.11

Sir Ronald Ross on quinine

In England, where re-infection does not occur, the routine treatment of the War Office and Ministry of Pensions is 10 grains of quinine daily in solution for nine to twelve weeks. Sir Ronald Ross, who is consultant to both departments, writes [23]:

But can we not cure the cases outright by some therapia magna sterilisans? I wish we could.

Unfortunately, though the War Office made innumerable experiments from early in 1917 onwards, no really satisfactory result was obtained. For details the reader should study the forthcoming War Office publication, Observations on Malaria, by medical officers of the Army and others (Stationery Office), The Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology (Liverpool) for the last two years, and many papers in the Lancet and other journals. We tried intravenous and intramuscular injections, heroic doses, kharsivan,27 and almost everything we could think of. Not one treatment provided a certain cure; and the treatments which gave the most promising results required at least a month’s stay in hospital, and were, I think, almost more severe than the disease. We still live in hopes; but up to the present the daily dosage described above remains the best, as it is the oldest used. If I had malaria today, I should not dream of allowing any other ‘cure’ to be practised on me.